Gender neutral.

Gender fluid.

Gender confused.

Gender nonsense.

An unconscious patient is brought into a hospital emergency room. Upon removing the patients clothing, hospital staff determine that the victim is one of two genders – male or female. The doodle and the va-jay-jay are the deciding factor here, not sociology professors.

Please don’t get me wrong, if someone wishes to identify as a different gender that is their choice. It’s of no concern to me. But when people argue that gender is a social construct, something needs to be said because that’s absurd. Sure, gender can be and is impacted and influenced by social constructs, but simply choosing to switch genders does not trump biology. Put simply,

– a woman who chooses to be a man is not suddenly impervious to cervical cancer.

– a man who chooses to be a woman is not suddenly resistant to testicular cancer.

– a woman suffering from endometriosis didn’t just eat a bad burrito with the boys Friday night.

– and a man who determines he wants to give birth cannot do so without surgical assistance to install some serious plumbing.

Simply thinking one way will not change the biology of the situation. At the end of the day, listening to your bodies biological chemistry will tell you more truth than any sociology professor will.

Without doubt the left has waged a highly successful campaign of weaponizing language in the war on free speech. Milo Yiannopoulos summed it up perfectly when he highlighted that leftists immediately hit you with an accusation, such as being racist, which instantly puts you on the defensive and makes you defend a position of their choosing. I cite Milo here because there is hardly a better example of being mislabeled a racist. And until someone can explain to me how a Nazi can have a black husband, I’m calling bollocks on that one.

So, the thing I am wondering is, when will we as a society agree to deny power over the “racist” accusation? Why do we endow these words with such meaning? Imagine if someone held racist views – and I argue that the majority of conservatives do not – is that worse than being a murderer? A rapist? A pederast? An arsonist? An embezzler? A kidnapper? A homophobe? A fan of Amy Schumer’s comedy?

Rather than fall into being defensive, there’s two things you can do. First, you need to take the air out of this balloon by simply laughing and asking, “Is that it? That’s all you have? No facts? No logic? Just a baseless accusation to try and win this argument. Wow, you really don’t have a case do you? Come back when you have some facts little one.” Laughing and shaking your head will make them mad and lose their composure, instantly shutting this line of attack down and give you the advantage. Check.

Second, you need to put it straight back on them. If the person calling you a racist is white, that’s the time to hit them with the ‘thou doth protest too much’ approach. “You seem really worked up on this issue when you’re not actually black. You know how diehard homophobes who rail against gays are secretly gay, could it be that your intensity on this issue is really a cheap mask for self-loathing due to your deep-seated racist beliefs? Are you really a Klu Klux Klan sympathiser deep down? Because that’s not cool, you should really get some help with that, you racist.” Checkmate.

Simply put, the best thing conservatives can do is laugh it off and not give any air to this ridiculous accusation. We would be further along as a society if we stopped letting liberals tar us with the racist brush. Oh wait, is that racist? If so, I have a very important question to ask – “What’s for lunch, you racist?”

Politico.com once wrote an article about 155 outlandish comments made by Donald Trump in the lead up to the 2016 election. Comedian Bill Burr best described his campaign by claiming he said, “three things a week that would torpedo anyone’s career”, but both miss the brilliance behind his strategy. Yes, I did just use the word ‘strategy’ and ‘Donald Trump’s election approach’ in the same sentence. Allow me to draw long bow.

Eminem, Pink, and Lady Ga Ga dominated the charts for years on end by following a simple approach – after a song peaked on the charts and began to decline, they quickly released another track, followed by another and another. What this did was keep the artist in the public consciousness as their songs were always playing on the television and radio. Trump used both his campaign speeches and his Twitter account to achieve just that.

Here is just a snippet of some of the outlandish things that emanated from Trump on the trail:

– On Senator John McCain: “He’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured, OK?”

– He said he knew, “more about ISIS than the generals”.

– He described Hillary’s campaign loss to Obama as being, “schlonged”.

– He gave out Lindsay Graham’s cell number.

– He stated that, “Heidi Klum. Sadly, she’s no longer a 10.”

– And lastly, he advised, “If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of ’em, would you? Seriously. OK? Just knock the hell—I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees. I promise. I promise.”

Bold? Yes. Absurd at times? Sure. Un-Presidential? You could say that. But the reality was these throwaway lines became the focus of the commentariat (news media, talk shows and celebrities) day after day, all of which dampened the message his opponent was struggling to get airtime for. While the media fixated on the newest ‘dumb Trumpism’, they inadvertently gave him free advertising and allowed him to dominate the public consciousness.

The left may claim that he is an idiot, and that’s one opinion. But he’s the 45^th President of the United States, and that’s a fact.

Above is a picture of protestors attempting to block ICE employees from entering a building.

So the left are stopping people from entering a location… by building a wall.

Good job everyone.

Picture: Tommy Robinson at the exact moment he realized he should have sent the work experience kid.

I quite like Tommy Robinson’s broadcasts. He is a brave man shining a light on uncomfortable parts of society that the liberal media and establishment do not want to face e.g. the ramifications of mass Islamic migration upon women, such as the grooming gangs he was covering back in May. Plus, I have a soft spot for any guy who, when confronted with threats of physical violence by pederasts and rapists, always steps up and says, “F*cken come on then!”

Many on the left advocate for open borders but steadfastly refuse to explore any negative results that come with it. What happens when men with archaic Third-World misogynistic beliefs meet unsuspecting naive young western girls? Realists know the answer is increased sexual assaults, rapes, and grooming gangs (Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands are just a few countries experiencing these problems). But in polite society you simply cannot say that, despite how many victims this process creates. But Tommy’s arrest for breaching the peace outside of a court house – although part of the elites attempts to sweep this problem under the rug – was Tommy’s fault and Tommy’s alone.

Previously in 2017, Tommy had gone before judge HHJ Norton for a similar situation and issued the following warning: “…turn up at another court, refer to people as “Muslim pedophiles, Muslim rapists” and so and so forth while trials are ongoing and before there has been a finding by a jury that that is what they are, and you will find yourself inside. Do you understand?”

Like the stupid people in B-grade horror movies who just have to go and see what the noise is in the dark basement, Tommy just had to go and do the exact thing he had been warned not to do.

I empathize, I respect his courage, I admire the work he has done on exposing grooming gangs which need to be stopped, but next time champ, send one of your lackeys. You can still be a beacon of truth and expose these problems from the comfort of your home. This is a far better option than sharing a cell block with people you helped put away.