Recent studies show around half of millennial’s find socialism appealing. Given that the same number are probably still living at home in their late twenties having their meals/washing/ironing done for them, it makes sense they would enjoy being eternally coddled.

Despite the overwhelming evidence available which proves that socialism has never worked – and that it has killed upwards of 100 million people – communism (which is what socialism leads to) never seems to lose its appeal with young people. A few notable reasons for this include: the spread of leftist ideology in schools and universities, the Bush recession gave them a negative view of capitalism; the election of President Bush and President Trump resulted in the left intensifying their vitriol which influenced their political beliefs through groupthink; the erosion of masculinity, the nuclear family, and a clear sense of purpose in life; the importance of youth in popular culture leading to a sense of power and delusion; and the decline of resilience, all of which makes being taken care of by the state an appealing prospect to young voters. Read any article on the appeal of socialism to the young and you will find one, if not all, of the above items mentioned. The one item which seems to go unnoticed though is this: youthful arrogance.

When Charlie Kirk asks college leftists to give him an example where socialism has worked – and they cannot – this line of attack rarely has the effect one would hope. The leftists never pause, go away and research, then return wearing an American flag pin admitting their ignorance whilst burning their ironically free-market purchased Che Guevara beret. Instead, like most young people who lack life experience, they simply think it hasn’t worked yet because they haven’t tried it. The missing piece in all socialist experiments is them. Sure, everybody else got it wrong, but not me. (When you think about it, there is an undertone of racism to this belief. What they’re really saying is that these primitive cultures/races couldn’t get it to work, but superior First World me will!) Devoid of business or government experience, lacking in property which they have not earned/paid for/grown attached to, or any real experience of life’s ups and downs, what we’re dealing with here is fantasy and delusion. There’s little logic or fact, just a lot of emotion and arrogance.

A friend once pointed out to me that ‘You cannot reason a person out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into’, which is why arguing with young socialists is such a pointless endeavour. Instead, we should help them all get jobs as soon as possible so they can see how much of their earnings are taken by the government. Suddenly, the unfairness that they’ve been railing against all these years will become real to them. Until that time, we’ll just have to sit back and enjoy watching socialists complain about workers’ rights when so few of them actually work.

The cast and crew of Guardians of the Galaxy have penned a letter urging Disney to rehire James Gunn and shame on them. Did we learn nothing from the whole #Metoo movement people? “Sure Harvey Weinstein forced himself onto a lot of women, but he makes good movies!”

I understand that a tweet is not an act. James Gunn did not perform these acts; they’re just words. But, words are a portal into someone’s heart. If this is not true, then why is a person vilified for using one racist slur? If someone says the ‘n’ word, that’s it; their career is over because they are viewed as an utterly heinous person with nothing good about them at all. Words are a window into a person’s mindset and for James Gunn, something ain’t right here. Let’s ignore his rapes joke for now, and simply look at three tweets:

“I’m doing a big Hollywood film adaptation of The Giving Tree with a happy ending – the tree grows back and gives the kid a blowjob.”

Huh? Kids and oral sex, this is a bit weird.

 “The Expendables was so manly I fucked the s**t out of the little pussy boy next to me!”

Joking about molesting a young boy. Now I have a black sense of humor, but I don’t find this funny.

“I like it when little boys touch me in my silly place. Shhh!”

Alright. Once is happenstance, twice a coincidence, but three times a pattern. Something is off here.

If you were sitting around with your mates and one blurted out he likes little boys to touch him, surely the room would go quiet, a line would be crossed, the friendship would end, and parents of children associated with this bloke would be contacted and warned. Hell, one of your mates might even belt him one in the mouth for good measure. So the idea that James Gunn can keep saying stuff like this and be rehired is just asking for trouble. Like when Mike Tyson was found guilty of rape and members of the public said he should be allowed to keep fighting and pay off his victims. No, no, and no. Actions have consequences and this guy should not be rewarded for promoting pedophilia.

I’m shocked it took this long to realize he wasn’t quite right, there were signs a plenty. Take this picture as exhibit A – when you choose to leave the house looking like Cameron Diaz in ‘There’s Something About Mary’, we should have all known something was up.

Madonna openly said she wanted to blow up the White House.

Kathy Griffin posed with a decapitated head of President Trump.

Peter Fonda said Barron Trump should be ripped from his mother’s arms and, “put in a cage with pedophiles”.

Yet somehow CNN’s Jim Acosta – a journalist with up to the second access to the above news – is rattled when Trump supporters heckle him chanting, “CNN sucks.” CNN’s April Ryan is on record saying Jim’s life was in jeopardy! Can you die from being heckled? If so, how is Amy Schumer still alive? The woman has laid down more bombs than Operation Rolling Thunder.

This says more about Jim and CNN being snowflakes than any real danger. Hat tip to Sarah Sanders. She faces far worse every day in front of a hostile media, shrugs it off and goes to dinner – when the left isn’t kicking her out of restaurants that is.

Enough said.

Of all the ridiculous labels the left has smeared President Trump with, being a Nazi must be the most baseless and idiotic.

To begin with, every Late Night Talk Show Hack who has slandered him, swore at him, and spewed vitriol towards he and his family on a nightly basis is still alive, still physically unharmed, and still not in any sort of concentration camp. Who can forget, after calling Ivanka Trump a “feckless cunt”, when Samantha Bee suddenly disappeared never to be seen or heard from again? Or when Stephen Colbert linked the President’s mouth with the term ‘cock hoslter’, and the Gestapo stormed onto his stage on live TV and executed him on the spot? These people haven’t been visited by any arm of law enforcement, faced no repercussions at the end of a rifle, and are still free to live their lives. Lift your game, Nazi Trump.

He is also in favor of immigration. The left has tried their best to link his strong stance against illegal immigration as an attack upon all migration – which it is not and never has been – but he encourages people from all walks of life to enter America legally and contribute positively to the culture. The same cannot be said for Nazi Germany who weren’t the most welcoming when it came to other cultures (they sure were big fans of visiting other cultures though). There also exists the fact that his wife is an immigrant from another country. She’s not American born, or as American as apple pie, so the idea he is keeping his Aryan stock pure is unsupportable.

Then there is the socialist issue. President Trump is a diehard capitalist. The guy is all about business and economics – hell, he’s even paid women to cover up affairs, so you know he’s pro-cash. This shoots holes in the National “Socialist” part of the Nazi label.

He is also a strong supporter of the state of Israel, recently moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. I seem to recall from all the textbooks I read that Hitler had a bit of a grudge against this race of people. I think a Jewish person made a comment about his mum once or something?

The real issue here is how this line of attack is played out is. President George W. Bush was a Nazi. Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney was a Nazi. President Reagan was a Nazi. Herman Goering was a Nazi… oh, wait. It’s the same thing on repeat, over and over, as if they only have enough room for two or three ideas in their head simultaneously. Maybe this is why the left keep coming back to socialism time and time again, they’ve only got three ideas tops.